CO129-534-9 Law of Piracy- case of Rex v. Chung Tam Kwong 1-4-1931 - 20-4-1932 — Page 2

CO129 Colonial Office Hong Kong Records 理藩院香港檔案 All

1 Gov 166

Consideralin.

In for

the Attorney

by.

14.4

a minute.

General.

? To h. Advises for Obsons

1.1. Tartin 20.5.31 Jtlalder

21.5.31

2

M. Bushe.

This is the case Incentioned to In to-day.

Pahaps

un might discuss it when y

have had an

opportunity of reading

the judgments.

10/6/31

P.S.

11. Duncan.

The facts and the law are set out in the

Judgments of the Full Court of Hong Kong, enclosed

in No.1, and it is unnecessary for me to summarise

them here. The point of practical importance

which emerges from these Judgments is that until

the decision that a robbery is necessary to support

a conviction for piracy in the Supreme Court of

Hong Kong is overruled, or until fresh legislation

regarding piracy is passed by the Imperial Parliament

as the acting Chief Justice of Hong Kong suggests,

persons who engage in armed attacks upon vessels on

the high seas cannot be convicted of piracy in Hong

Kong unless they actually commit robbery at the same

time.

If it is desired to put an end to this state

of affairs, an appeal from the decision of the Full

Court

Comments

Approved members can add comments, bookmarks, and private notes.

No comments yet.

Private Research Note

Private notes are available after approval.